Hong Kong Inkundla Zokugqibela Isibheno uyala shiya ukuba isibheno kwi-Grand Pacific v. Pacific-China meko - Kluwer Arbitration Hetalia

v. (cofa apha ukuze ikopi isihlalo)

Kunyaka we-Snake uqalile auspiciously kuba arbitration kwi-Hong Kong, kunye nje isigqibo i-Hong Kong Inkundla Zokugqibela Isibheno ("CFA") ukukrwela umgca kwakhona kolawulo lwesixeko ke arbitration-eyobuhlobo credentials kwaye reluctance yayo iinkundla ukuba interfere kunye arbitral inkqubo arbitral MbasaNgomhla we-nineteen februwari, i-CFA wala shiya ukuba isibheno ngokuchasene isihlalo ye-Hong Kong Inkundla Isibheno ("CA") kwi-Grand Pacific Holdings Ltd. I CA ke, isihlalo, nto leyo ibisoloko widely applauded kwi-arbitration zoluntu ukusukela ekubeni zinikezelwe ukuhla Ngomeyi ka, reinstated i-ICC arbitral Kweelwimi apho bebe bucala yi-Hong Kong Inkundla Isehlo Sokuqala ("CFI").

Ifumanise ukuba akukho breaches ka-Inqaku yenzeka

Ngomhla ezingundoqo kwetyala baba allegations nge-e-Pacific-China Holdings Ltd.

("Pacific-China") ukuze ube bebe saliwe ithuba ukuze imizamo yayo meko kwaye ukuba umgaqo-nkqubo yamkelwa kwi-arbitration akazange ngokungqinelana isivumelwano zamaqela.

E-Pacific-China argued ukuba ezi alleged procedural irregularities babebaninzi breach ka-Inqaku UNCITRAL Imodeli Umthetho, apho imisela ngaphandle emidlalo ngomhla apho arbitral Mbasa zibe kubekela bucala ama-(njenge ezininzi imida kwihlabathi liphela, Hong Kong adopts i-UNCITRAL Imodeli Umthetho njengenxalenye yalo-sikhokelo edibeneyo arbitration, ngokusebenzisa i-Hong Kong Arbitration Ummiselo (Cap.). Kwi controversial isihlalo ngojuni ka, i-CFI igcine ukuba kukho bebe breaches ye Inqaku, kwaye bucala le Mbasa. Ekwenzeni oku ukufumana, CA kukhankanyiwe i-libanzi meko ulawulo amagunya arbitral Tribunals eziya a cornerstone ye-arbitral nkqubo. Eziphethwe ukuba, ukuze i-arbitral Kweelwimi ukuba abe bucala kwi ngenxa inkqubo emidlalo, kuya kufuneka ukuba kuboniswa ukuba nawuphi na breaches ka-Inqaku ababebizwa a"ezinzima"okanye nkqu"egregious"indalo. Olwamkelekileyo kwi-obiter izimvo ukuba i-Hong Kong iinkundla kuba yedwa hayi bucala mbasa nkqu apho ukwaphulwa komthetho Inqaku (a) lusekiwe (Inqaku thelekisa iimeko apho i-Mbasa"babe"kuba bucala), ukuba yanelisekile ukuba isiphumo ayikwazanga zithe ezahluka-hlukileyo. Eziphethwe ukuba mthwalo ngomhla ngu-sicelo wishing to bucala i-Mbasa ukubonisa ukuba oko bebe, okanye babe zithe, prejudiced yi-ukuziphatha enkundleni yamatyala. I-CFA ke nje isigqibo abachaphazelekayo Pacific-China ke umzamo isibheno ngokuchasene CA ke isigwebo. I CA ngokwayo kokuba kwehla ngojuni ka- isibonelelo shiya ukuba isibheno ukusuka yayo isihlalo. E-Pacific-China ke isetyenziswe ngqo kwi-CFA kuba shiya pursuant Lama- lomthetho i-Hong Kong Inkundla Zokugqibela Isibheno Mmiselo, arguing ukuba kwaba anelungelo lokuba isibheno zombini"ngathi ekunene"kwaye ngenxa yokuba ityala obandakanyekayo imibuzo"enkulu jikelele okanye uluntu ukubaluleka". E a kokuva ka-Pacific-China ke isicelo kwi nineteen februwari, i-CFA akazange yamkela ukuba Pacific-China waba anelungelo lokuba kunikelwa shiya ukuba isibheno kwaye dismissed isicelo. I-CFA ke isigqibo kuthetha ukuba CA ke isigwebo ngoku kumi njengoko authoritative ingxelo umthetho ngokunxulumene inkqubo yokumisela bucala ka-arbitral Mbasa kwi-Hong Kong. Kubalulekile ukuba abe ayethembe ukuba isiqinisekiso yi CA le umda apho umntu kufuneka ahlangane ukuze kumiswe ukwaphulwa komthetho Inqaku kwi ngenxa inkqubo emidlalo kufuneka discourage amaqela ukusuka umleqa unmeritorious imingeni ukuba arbitral mbasa kwi-Hong Kong. Ezinjalo imingeni izakuba ngakumbi ill-advised kwi-ukukhanya eyahlukileyo isigqibo CA (bona hetalia ngeposi apha) apho CA cited kunye ukuvunywa caselaw ukuba isiphumo sokuba, apho iqela unsuccessfully usebenza bucala i-Mbasa, kuya kufuneka kwi-siseko silindele ukuba ahlawule iindleko kwi ngaphezulu qho kunesiqhelo, ngoba umntu ezama ukuba enforce i-arbitral Kweelwimi akufunekanga kufuneka ukuphikisana enjalo mngeni. Zombini izigqibo i CA umgca ngaphantsi i-Hong Kong Iinkundla' ixesha elide-emi inkxaso kuba arbitration kwaye abonise ukuba baya kuba inokwenza ukuba interfere kunye procedural izigqibo Tribunals, ngokungqinelana kunye nemigangatho yehlabathi. Ngabo kusenokwenzeka ukuba abe influential ngamanye UNCITRAL Imodeli Umthetho imida ngokunjalo.

Ukuba uqinisekise ukuba musa unobuhle ngaphandle ngomhla rhoqo uhlaziyo ukususela Kluwer Arbitration Hetalia, nceda zibophelele apha.

I-CFA zinikezelwe ukuhla yayo ukubhalwa izizathu yayo ukwaliwa kwesicelo ukuba isibonelelo shiya ukuba isibheno namhlanje, amashumi amabini uwaphinda-omnye februwari.

Kwi-isicwangciso ngaphandle yayo izizathu, CFA yavakalisa endorsed Inkundla ka-Isibheno ke, isihlalo, exela ukuba,"wethu imboniselo, Inkundla Isibheno waba ngokupheleleyo echanekileyo ukubamba ukuba izikhalazo ephambili yi-PCH musa eyiyo viable emidlalo kuba sicwangciso bucala kweelwimi phantsi aforesaid izibonelelo. I-ulawulo complained ka-zenziwa yi-isigqeba ngendlela efanelekileyo ukusebenzisa yayo procedural kwaye kunjalo ulawulo discretions, reflecting yayo, uvavanyo iimfuno procedural isidima njengoko kufanelekile ukuba iimeko. Akukho isiseko soluvo kokuphazamiseka nge Inkundla. Akukho reasonably arguable qho wenziwe disclosed kuba ngokumnika shiya ukuba isibheno.".